Monitoring and treatment of hypercholesterolemia after an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease event in Denmark from 2015 to 2020.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lowering the blood concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is a cornerstone in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Current European guidelines recommends LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L for secondary prevention in high-risk patients. The aim of this study is to investigate monitoring and treatment of hypercholesterolemia one year after a ASCVD event. METHODS: Danish patients with hypercholesterolemia and an incident ASCVD event from 2015 to 2020 were included in this nationwide cohort study. Patients' LDL-C measurements and lipid-lowering treatment were followed for one year after ASCVD event, or until death or migration. Imputation was used to estimate absolute LDL-values when patients were unmeasured. RESULTS: A total of 139,043 patients were included in the study with a mean follow-up time of 10.4 months. During the one-year period, 120,020 (86%) patients had their LDL-C measured at least once, 83,723 (60%) patients were measured at least twice. During the period one to six months after ASCVD event 25,999 (19%) achieved an LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L, 93,349 (67%) failed to achieve an LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L, and 196,950 (14%) had died or migrated. Missing LDL-C values were estimated via imputation. At the end of month twelve, 60,583 (44%) patients were in statin monotherapy, 2926 (2%) were treated with other lipid-lowering treatment, 42,869 (31%) were in no treatment, and 32,665 (23%) had died or migrated. CONCLUSIONS: Many Danish patients are not appropriately followed-up with LDL-C measurements, and a substantial number of patients are not in lipid-lowering treatment one year after an ASCVD event.

Associations between education level, blood-lipid measurements and statin treatment in a Danish primary health care population from 2000 to 2018.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether education level influences screening, monitoring, and treatment of hypercholesterolemia. DESIGN: Epidemiological cohort study. SETTING: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre. SUBJECTS: Cholesterol blood test results ordered by general practitioners in Greater Copenhagen were retrieved from 2000-2018. Using the International Standard Classification of Education classification, the population was categorized by length of education in three groups (basic education; up to 10 years, intermediate education; 11-12 years, advanced education; 13 years or more). The database comprised 13,019,486 blood sample results from 653,903 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of lipid measurement, prevalence of statin treatment, age and comorbidity at treatment initiation, total cholesterol threshold for statin treatment initiation, and achievement of treatment goal. RESULTS: The basic education group was measured more frequently (1.46% absolute percentage difference of total population measured [95% CI 0.86%-2.05%] in 2000 and 9.67% [95% CI 9.20%-10.15%] in 2018) over the period compared to the intermediate education group. The advanced education group was younger when receiving first statin prescription (1.87 years younger [95% CI 1.02-2.72] in 2000 and 1.06 years younger [95% CI 0.54-1.58 in 2018) compared to the intermediate education group. All education groups reached the treatment goals equally well when statin treatment was initiated. CONCLUSION: Higher education was associated with earlier statin prescription, although the higher educated group was monitored less frequently. There was no difference in reaching treatment goal between the three education groups. These findings suggest patients with higher education level achieve an earlier dyslipidemia prevention intervention with an equally satisfying result compared to lower education patients.Key PointsLittle is known about the role of social inequality as a possible barrier for managing hypercholesterolemia in general practice.Increasing education level was associated to less frequent measurement and less frequent statin treatment.Patients with higher education level were younger, and less comorbidity at first statin prescription.Education level had no effect on frequency of statin treatment-initiated patients reaching the treatment goal was found.

Sample size estimation practices in research protocols submitted to Danish scientific ethics committees.

BACKGROUND: Sample size in research projects is estimated before initiation of the study to minimise type 1 and type 2 error, while keeping the study's financial cost and subject enrolment to a minimum. This study investigates project-specific factors potentially associated with correct estimation of sample size in study protocols. METHODS: Examination of 189 non-commercially sponsored study protocols (84 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 105 non-RCT studies) submitted to the Scientific Ethics Committees of The Capitol Region of Denmark from 2013 to 2015. RESULTS: 119 (63%) study protocols contained a sample size calculation, with a significantly higher rate of sample size calculations in RCT vs non-RCT study protocols (76% vs. 52%, p < 0.001). Significantly more intervention studies than non-intervention studies (69% vs 52%, p = 0.020), studies including blood samples compared to those without (69% vs. 55%, p = 0.045), studies funded by a foundation donation compared to those with no funding (68% vs. 49%, p = 0.040) performed sample size calculations. Further, increasing number of sick patients enrolled (p = 0.048) and newer studies (p = 0.032) were more likely to include a sample size calculation in the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of sample size is more often reported in RCT than non-RCT study protocols. Also, intervention studies, studies funded by a foundation donation, studies including blood samples, studies with a greater amount of sick participants and chronologically newer study protocols more often reported a sample size calculation.